Lady Gaga Dazzles the Imagination in a Bikini in Puerto Rico

Hola amigos: Lady Gaga in Puerto Rico lounging at a pool  in a metallic Miller Lite two-piece bikini with gold hoops and a navy bandana. The 26-year-old superstar showing her curves appeared comfortable in her bikini with her friends in Puerto Rico. ES

 

Lady Gaga in Puerto Rico Image

 

by Harold Mandel

http://www.examiner.com/article/lady-gaga-dazzles-the-imagination-a-bikini-puerto-rico

 

There has been so much interest in Lady Gaga showing up by the poolside and at the beach in Puerto Rico in a skimpy bikini that she has been written up by Alyssa Toomey in an article on Nov. 6, 2012 for E Online News:Bikini Shot of the Day: Lady Gaga Flaunts Her Figure in Puerto Rico. Gaga was recently seen during a much deserved vacation lounging at a pool in Puerto Rico in a metallic Miller Lite two-piece bikini that she accessorized with gold hoops and a navy bandana. Although the 26-year-old superstar has been taking some heat lately for having gained some weight, she appeared comfortable in her bikini with her friends in Puerto Rico.

Joyce Chen has also covered this story in an article on Nov. 5, 2012 for the New York Daily News: Lady Gaga shows off fuller bikini body in Puerto Rico. It has been reported that Gaga stripped down to a skin-tight, blue-and-white bikini while she was relaxing on the beach with friends in San Juan, Puerto Rico recently, and she didn’t care who was watching her, even though she has gained some weight recently. Although Gaga has admitted that she gained 30 pounds earlier this year, she appeared to be enjoying herself on the beach in Puerto Rico in a fashionable bikini with her friends DJ White Shadow and Tara Savelo.

View slideshow: Views of Lady Gaga

Gaga, who has a reputation for being eccentric, stopped in Puerto Rico during her ‘Born This Way Ball’ tour. She has commented about the negativity which has surrounded her fuller figure, “I was acutely aware of some photos on the Internet – my mom called me and was like, ‘Did you gain weight?’ Everybody was telling me about it, and I didn’t really care. I thought, ‘Well, I don’t really care if they think I’m fat, because, quite honestly, I did gain about 30 pounds.’” Nevertheless, the general consensus among Gaga fans is that she looks magnificent and is as talented as ever. As for the added weight, well in the best interest of her health perhaps she should get into more healthy eating habits and more exercise.

 

Mensaje Gracioso: ¡Me despido del mundo porque ya no sé quien soy!

En un “e-mail” me enviaron esta carta y como se relaciona al
tema de la genealogía y es graciosa, la comparto:

 

 

Imagen Album Familiar por Bitaran

 

Junto al cadáver de un suicida se encontró una carta donde
explicaba lo siguiente:

No se culpe a nadie de mi muerte. Me quito
la vida porque es mucho martirio para mí, verán:

Tuve la desgracia de casarme con
una viuda que tenía una hija.

Mi padre también era viudo y se enamoró y

se casó con la hija de mi mujer que pasó a

ser suegra de su suegro.

Mi hijastra se convirtió en mi madrastra y

mi padre era mi yerno.

Mi madrastra tuvo una niña que era mi
hermana pero era nieta de mi mujer así que yo

era abuelo de mi hermana.

Mi mujer trajo al mundo un niño que como era hermano
de mi madrastra, era cuñado de mi padre,
nieto de su hermana y mi tío.

Mi mujer era nuera de su hija y yo padrastro de mi madrastra y
mi padre y su mujer son mis hijastros, mi hijo es mi bisnieto y tío
de su tía y yo soy mi propio abuelo.

¡Me despido del mundo porque ya no sé quien soy!

Puerto Rico 2012: *Plebiscito – Estadidad – *Nuevo Gobernador – García Padilla – PPD

Puerto Rico 2012: Plebiscito – Estadidad – Nuevo Gobernador – García Padilla – PPD - La opción de la estadidad salió favorecida con 802,179 votos y el ELA soberano obtuvo 436,997 mientras que el nuevo gobernador es Alejandro García Padilla, del PPD (estatus actual ELA) y el actual gobernador,Luis Fortuño, acepta su derrota. ES

Imagen Elecciones Puerto Rico 2012

 

Garcia Padilla Celebra su Triunfo en Coamo

Por Frances Rosario / frances.rosario@gfrmedia.com

El virtual ganador de la contienda a la gobernación, el popular Alejandro García Padilla, participará esta tarde de una fiesta de pueblo en Coamo para celebrar su victoria.

El evento, pautado para las 6:00 p.m., en la plaza pública, es organizado por su hermano el alcalde de Coamo, Juan Carlos García Padilla.

“Fue algo que se comprometió con su pueblo de venir a celebrar con su pueblo. Le tenemos una fiesta de pueblo para recibir a nuestro gobernador electo”, señaló el alcalde.

Se espera que al mediodía de hoy la Comisión Estatal de Elecciones (CEE) certifique preliminarmente a García Padilla como el gobernador electo.

Con el 96% de los votos contados, García Padilla aventaja al gobernador Luis Fortuño 873,072. El estadista, por su parte, tenía 858,361.

“Vamos a tener que trabajar duro y fuerte con compromiso genuino con nuestra gente. Cuando dijimos que íbamos a poner al pueblo primero, pues el servicio del gobierno tiene que ser excelente”, opinó el alcalde sobre la victoria.

Por otro lado, el ejecutivo municipal dijo que no será beneficiado por tener un hermano gobernador.

“No espero ser beneficiado por ser mi hermano, sino ganarme las cosas por lo que estoy haciendo”, señaló, al hablar de un plan de desarrollo de ciudad que tiene preparado para su municipio.

Elections Puerto Rico 2012 Results: Statehood and New Governor

Hola amigos: Citizens in Puerto Rico, the U.S. island territory cannot vote in the presidential election, but participated in a referendum that could push the territory toward statehood, greater autonomy or independence.

Elections Puerto Rico 2012 Results: Puerto Ricans decided they should change their ties with the United States and their Governor: Statehood won for the first time in history and the new Governor chosen is Alejandro Garcia Padilla, whose Popular Democratic Party favors the status quo. ES

Elections Puerto Rico 2012 Image

 

by Latino Fox news

Based on reporting by the Associated Press

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2012/11/06/election-2012-puerto-ricans-head-to-poll-to-decide-ties-to-us/#ixzz2BYJQovef

 

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico –  As voter across the U.S. head to the polls to pick a new president, Puerto Ricans headed to the polls to decide if they should change their ties with the United States.

Citizens in the U.S. island territory cannot vote in the U.S. presidential election, but many were excited to participate in a referendum that could push the territory toward statehood, greater autonomy or independence.

Car horns blared and party flags waved as voters headed to polling stations, many carrying umbrellas against the blistering tropical sun as temperatures neared 90 degrees Fahrenheit (31 degrees centigrade).

The two-part referendum first asks voters if they want to change Puerto Rico’s 114-year relationship with the United States. A second question gives voters three alternatives if they do want a change: become the 51st U.S. state, independence, or “sovereign free association,” a designation that would give more autonomy for the territory of 4 million people.

 

SUMMARY

A status of sovereign free association would give Puerto Rico more autonomy and allow U.S. jurisdiction only in certain judicial matters. The details of the relationship would have to be agreed upon by the U.S. and Puerto Rican governments.

 

“Puerto Rico has to be a state. There is no other option,” said 25-year-old Jerome Lefebre, who picked up his grandfather before driving to the polls. “We’re doing OK, but we could do better. We would receive more benefits, a lot more financial help.”

But 42-year-old Ramon López de Azua said he favors the current system, which grants U.S. citizenship but prevents Puerto Ricans from voting for president unless they live in the United States, and gives those on the island only limited representation in Congress.

“Puerto Rico’s problem is not its political status,” he said. “I think that the United States is the best country in the world, but I am Puerto Rican first.”

Both President Barack Obama and rival Mitt Romney have said they supported the referendum, with Obama pledging to respect the will of the people if there is a clear majority. Any change would require approval by the U.S. Congress.

The island also is electing legislators and a governor, with Gov. Luis Fortuño of the pro-statehood New Progressive Party seeking a second term. Fortuño, a Republican, is running against Alejandro Garcia Padilla, whose Popular Democratic Party favors the status quo.

Pro-statehooders say Puerto Rico would benefit from becoming a state because it would receive an additional $20 billion a year in federal funds to boost the local economy and combat crime. The island currently has a higher unemployment rate than any U.S. state at 13.6 percent.

A status of sovereign free association would give Puerto Rico more autonomy and allow U.S. jurisdiction only in certain judicial matters. The details of the relationship would have to be agreed upon by the U.S. and Puerto Rican governments.

Puerto Rico also held non-binding referendums in 1967, 1993 and 1998, with statehood never garnering a clear majority and independence never obtaining more than 5 percent of the vote.

In a recent poll, local newspaper El Nuevo Dia found that a slim majority favored the current political status. On the second question, the preference for statehood topped sovereign free association. Few said they favor independence.

El Nuevo Dia Poll Image

Based on reporting by the Associated Press.

Election 2012: Obama Wins Re-Election, Clinches Latino Vote

Hola amigos: Election 2012 results:Keep it Forward. The article – “Obama Wins Re-Election, Clinches Latino Vote” – tells us that Latinos got  attention in this election because we had simply become too numerous to ignore, (more than 50 million, according to the 2010 U.S. Census).  ”That is larger than the entire national populations of Cuba, Venezuela, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic combined” is the article summary. ES

 

Election 2012 Image

 

By Elizabeth Llorente

Fox News Latino

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2012/11/06/election-2012-obama-wins-re-election-after-clinching-ohio/#ixzz2BY0CPrA9

America said yes to four more years.

It was a hard-won second victory for President Barack Obama, who was neck-and-neck in the polls as election season came down to the wire.

Obama, who made history in 2008 when he became the first U.S. president with African heritage, tried to hold onto the Oval office amid one of the most bitterly partisan, and tough economic times in the country.

It was also an election in which Latinos and their interests and concerns got more attention than ever – in the media, and by conservative and liberal politicians alike (though not always in a positive way).

The Obama campaign warned that his GOP challenger, Mitt Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, would push policies that would favor the rich at the expense of the middle-class and low-income Americans. Obama warned Latinos that a Romney presidency would be hostile to immigrants and Latinos.

In June, Obama announced that he would suspend deportation for undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as minors and who met a strict set of criteria. More than 1 million immigrants are believed to be affected by the initiative, which Romney said he would discontinue if he became president.

Romney ran into problems with Latinos when he took a particularly hard line on immigration during the GOP primaries.

In an effort to appeal to the party’s conservative base, Romney voiced support for the Arizona anti-illegal immigration law, SB 1070, parts of which were upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as “self-deportation,” in essence making life so difficult for undocumented immigrants that they would leave of their own accord.

Romney also aligned himself with some of the nation’s most hard-line proponents of tough immigration policies, including Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, former California Gov. Pete Wilson and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who is architect of the Arizona immigration law, as well as similar measures in other states.

Romney had tried to appeal to Latinos, and other voters, by casting Obama as someone who had failed to improve the economy, and whose administration had made things difficult for small business owners.

Latinos apparently responded to the many appeals for their support, with exit polls showing that they seem to have turned out in record numbers, accounting for 10 percent of the electorate. In 2008, when they set a record, they accounted for nine percent of voters.

In Florida, a key state, with 29 electoral votes, Latinos were said to account for about 17 percent of voters who cast ballots – eligible voters make up 19 percent in the Sunshine State.

Exit polls conducted by impreMedia/Latino Decisions nationwide and in 11 key battleground states indicate that Latino voters played a critical role in Obama getting a second term and keeping a Democratic majority in the Senate.

“In all cases, immigration reform and the dramatic distinction between the two parties on the issue was a major driver of Latino voter political choices,” said a statement put out by America’s Voice, an immigration advocacy group.

The Latino Decisions polls indicate that nationwide and in battleground states Obama won Latino voter support over Romney by historic margins –  72 percent to 23 percent nationwide, including: in Colorado, Obama won Latino voters by 87 percent-10 percent margin; in New Mexico, by a 77 percent-21 percent margin; in Nevada, by an 80 percent-17 percent margin; in Ohio, by an 82 percent-17 percent margin; in Virginia, by a 66 percent-31 percent margin; and in Florida, by a 58 percent-40 percent margin.

Latinos got unparalleled attention in this election because they had simply become too numerous to ignore, numbering more than 50 million, according to the 2010 U.S. Census. That is larger than the entire national populations of Cuba, Venezuela, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic combined.

And a record number – nearly 24 million — had become eligible to vote, with some 11 million expected actually to do so.

In an election where they were viewed as being a pivotal group, Obama had the advantage with likely Latino voters, with recent polls by Fox News Latino and others showing him leading GOP challenger Mitt Romney with more than 70 percent of their support, compared to about 21 percent for the former Massachusetts governor.

For Latinos, the stakes of this election were particularly high – choose a president who has vowed to keep improving the employment rate and to keep safety nets for those who remain unemployed or underemployed, or Romney, who also vowed to improve the economy but who has made clear his misgivings about government programs that he views as wasteful and discouraging self-reliance?

Many Latinos supported Obama’s healthcare reform bill. Romney had voiced opposition to the Affordable Care Act. Hispanic Americans continue to be the most likely to be uninsured, with more than 40 percent going without health coverage in 2011, according to a Gallup poll released earlier this year. Gallup said it was the highest portion of uninsured it had recorded any key group since it began tracking in 2008.

And for Latinos who considered immigration a priority issue, the presidential election presented a choice between an avowed proponent of hardline immigration policies and a president who campaigned in 2008 on the promise of reforming immigration, but did not do so. What is more, to the frustration of many Latinos, a record number of immigrants – most of them Latinos – have been deported under Obama than any other president.

“Latinos will expect to be supported in education, healthcare and immigration,” said Angelica Salas, executive director for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA). “With another Obama presidency, there will be a demand to stop all deportations and to pass immigration reform. There will be a demand that he make good on his promises from the first term.”

Gabe Gonzalez, the national campaign director for the Campaign for Community Change, agrees.

“I take President Obama at his word, with one caveat – we have to make sure that he does what he says he’ll do,” Gonzalez said. “If there is one thing we Latinos have learned, it’s that we get the respect and political power that we demand.”

Craig Romney, Mitt Romney’s son, told Fox News Latino just before the election: “We’ve seen what Barack Obama’s policies will do, we know those are not working, if he is reelected we can expect more of the same over the next four years.”

“I’ve been privileged to be able to travel across the country and represent my father to the Hispanic community and one of the things I’ve heard over and over is that people have been struggling in this economy,” said Romney, a fluent Spanish-speaker who did Latino outreach for his father’s campaign. “My dad, he has a plan to get the economy back on track and that includes getting Hispanics back to work, one of the communities that have been hit hardest in this economy…I think over 2 million Hispanics have gone into poverty over the past four years.”

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a group that advocates for more lenient immigration policies, said: “Today our nation witnessed the strength of democracy in action. An extraordinary number of voters, including record numbers of Latino, Asian and New American voters, went to the polls clamoring for practical solutions that honor our values and move our nation forward.”

“The message was clear: President Obama must fulfill his campaign promise and work with congressional leaders to create a common-sense immigration process that treats all people with dignity,” Noorani said. “And Republicans must choose pragmatism over extremism on immigration, putting forward practical solutions that create a roadmap to citizenship for aspiring Americans.”

 

GENEALOGY TODAY: Dealing With Touchy Issues

Hola amigos: Today I have a great article about how to handle touchy issues of your genealogical findings.  Sensitive issues are in all families and you have to be very careful how you handle them.

In my case, I had to deal with some very touchy ones. Just remember who’s the owner of the secret (the victims) and respect that . ES

Google Image

 

By Betty Lou Malesky

bettymalesky@ cox.net

www.rootsweb.com/~azgvgs/

Special to the Green Valley News

If you do family research long enough, you’re bound to wind up confronting sensitive issues. As King Solomon once wrote, “Nothing is new under the sun.” We all have skeletons in our family closets, and must decide what to do with them when we compile a family history.

Do we keep them locked away, ignore and cover them up? Or do we confront and defuse them? Some issues of the past are not as shocking today, but we need to consider how revelation may affect living descendants. Usually, honesty with a touch of compassion is the best policy.

A recent issue on a genealogical email list has been illegitimacy. A question was posted asking what surname to use for a child who was living with his mother and a man not his father. The 1880 census listed the man, then the mother with her husband’s surname and her several children with her same surname. Births were not officially recorded at the time and place in question.

The mother’s relationship to the man she was currently living with was “concubine,” so it was apparent they were not married. Her husband had left and never returned before any of the children were born. The man and the mother did marry 35 years later, perhaps after the death of her husband.

In colonial days illegitimate, bastard, or “out of wedlock,” often appeared right on the birth record. Illegitimacy was considered a crime with bastardy laws in effect in several states into the 1900s. In some states, a pregnant woman was brought into court, examined under oath and asked to name the child’s father. He was then served a warrant and required to post a bastardy bond. If the woman refused to name someone, she, her father or some other interested party would be required to post the bond. The big concern was not to protect the child, but to protect the state from having to support it.

My third great-grandmother, Sarah Bly appears in her father’s home on the 1850 New York census at the age of 16 with a one-month-old baby. Chautauqua County registered births for a short time in 1850; this birth is recorded with the father’s name blank.

Sarah married in 1852. In the 1855 New York state census and ever after, Sarah’s son Edward bears her husband’s surname. He used that name all his life despite there never being a formal adoption. When she applied for a Civil War Widow’s pension, however, she correctly did not list her eldest son as one of her husband’s children. I doubt anyone but the immediate family knew the whole story.

Would Edward’s descendants today be shocked or offended to read the details of his birth? As family historians we need to be careful neither to distort records of the time nor to change their meaning. It certainly is a fine line and the readers’ feelings should be considered when appropriate, but not at the expense of intended meaning or accuracy. After over 150 years have passed, it seems time alone should have defused the issue.

To put the subject into the context of today, in 2005 a record 1.5 million births were recorded in the U.S. to unmarried mothers, and only 24 percent of them were teenagers. Nearly a third of all births were technically illegitimate. In 2008, unmarried women accounted for 1,726,566 live births, 41 percent of the total for the year.

Now to return to our original problem: The surname to use for an illegitimate child. In this case, as he grew up, the surname the child himself used should be used in the family history. Perhaps he continued to use the first husband’s name or began using the name of the man living with his mother, or perhaps another name.

Should her children all be designated illegitimate? The simple answer is, “Yes.” We can’t impute a father when none is known. A less confrontational handling might be, “Documentation was not found to identify his father.” As historians, we need to conscientiously report the facts without being judgmental.

 

“Searching For Sugar Man”

Hola amigos:  Sixto Diaz Rodriguez also known as Sixto Rodriguez was born July 10, 1942. He is a Mexican-American folk musician, born in Detroit, Michigan. Rodriguez’s parents were middle-class immigrants who left Mexico in the 1920′s.  In most of his songs he takes a political stance on the cruelties facing the inner city poor of the 60′s, his world. ”Searching for Sugar Man” is a documentary about him, a musician very few people had heard about. In the last six months, film festivals  played a central role in introducing a forgotten 70-year-old protest singer from Detroit who sold a lot of records in South Africa and was a hero there but who never knew about it. He was dead for many but found living in the same house he lived in Detroit. ES

Sugar Man Image

 

By Billboard.com

http://www.billboard.com/news/cult-singer-rodriguez-risen-in-new-film-1007690952.story#/news/cult-singer-rodriguez-risen-in-new-film-1007690952.story

“Searching for Sugar Man” is a documentary about a musician very few people had heard about prior to this year. In the last six months, film festivals from January’s Sundance in Utah through the Hamptons in New York on July 21 have played a central role in introducing a forgotten 70-year-old protest singer from Detroit: Rodriguez.

 

Sixto Rodriguez cut two albums of soulful folk rock for Sussex — home to Bill  – at the start of the ’70s. Utterly unheard at home, his music took root in South Africa, where his political and personal themes resonated with the blossoming anti-apartheid movement. His legend grew there, but only arrived stateside when indie label Light in the Attic reissued “Cold Fact” in August 2008. (It has sold 17,000 copies, according to Nielsen SoundScan.) “Searching for Sugar Man” will deliver Rodriguez’s greatest exposure at home.

 

A unique string of double-bills of screenings and performances has generated a fair amount of buzz for the artist and this remarkable documentary about the curious facets of his life. The film premiered at the Sundance Film Festival and Rodriguez performed at BMI’s Snowball in Park City, Utah; a Joe’s Pub gig in New York complemented a Tribeca festival screening; less than two hours after a South by Southwest presentation he was onstage at Mohawk in Austin; and in Los Angeles, “Sugar Man” screened on a Tuesday, he played the Hotel Cafe on Wednesday and spoke about his music at the Grammy Museum  on Thursday with Death Cab for Cutie’s Ben Gibbard  and the Jayhawks’ Gary Louris. He tends to perform whatever strikes his fancy — a cover of “Smoke Gets in Your Eyes” or Midnight Oil’s “Redneck Wonderland” — plus his own “Inner City Blues,” “Street Boy” or “Forget It” on the rarely seen acoustic-electric nylon-stringed guitar.

 

“The beauty of his live performance is that you see the simple, honest, gentle soul you discover in the film,” says Sony Legacy president Adam Block, who will release the film’s soundtrack on July 24. (Light in the Attic will put out a double-LP vinyl edition in August.) “He’s not pretending. It’s imperfect and quite magnificent.”

 

It’s a unique model — expose the film and an artist who has been under the radar for four decades — that Sony Pictures Classics and the Booking Agency hope to continue when the documentary is released theatrically beginning July 27 in New York and Los Angeles. The film will roll out in major cities through the summer; Rodriguez will start a tour of at least 30 North American cities on Aug. 30 that runs through Nov. 5 before heading to Europe.

 

“We’re waiting about a month to start the tour so the full impact of the movie is felt,” says the Booking Agency’s Christian Bernhardt, who has booked Rodriguez for more than three years. “We cover the major cities this year and then go into secondary markets next year. It’s a similar approach that we took with Daniel Johnston  when his film ["The Devil and Daniel Johnston"] came out [in 2005].”
The model may well parallel the Johnston effort but the hope is more in line with “Anvil: The Story of Anvil,” the 2008 documentary that gave a new career to a long-struggling metal band from Canada. The difference here is that Rodriguez, in the United States, pretty much dropped out of sight after his two records went nowhere in the early ’70s and has done only a few dozen shows in the last four years. Internationally, he toured Australia in 1979 and 1981 and made triumphant appearances in South Africa in 1998, the payoff moment in “Sugar Man.”

 

The search for Rodriguez is made by a few fans and journalists in South Africa who cherished his music. To those fans, Rodriguez was as big as Bob Dylan, their isolation from the outside world blinding them from the, ahem, cold facts. Rumors abounded that he had killed himself onstage and they were determined to tell the truth about his death.

 

Once they discover he is alive, a six-show victory tour is arranged, and after the first night, the percussionist in Rodriguez’s backing band figures they are in the middle of an extraordinary event and gets a friend to film the shows. Without that footage, this unbelievable story might feel like a hoax.

 

Sony Pictures Classics co-presidents Tom Bernard and Michael Barker bought the North American rights to “Sugar Man” prior to the Sundance screening, without seeing it first. (The film has been sold in 20 other territories, most recently Japan and South Africa.) Bernard read the description and decided, “If it’s half as good as what I read, then it’s worth having. And it’s twice as good as what I read.”

 

Rights in hand, the film was screened for Columbia Records chairman/CEO Rob Stringer, which led to more of Sony coming onboard, and a late-July release date was set. “It’s a great end-of-the-summer movie that can carry into the fall and catch the returning college students,” Bernard says. “It’s going to be in the marketplace for a long, long time because the potential is way beyond the music audience. I call it the ‘Shawshank Redemption’ of documentaries.”

 

In 1970, the only person who had an equal amount of faith in the man born Sixto Rodriguez was Clarence Avant , who made the singer/songwriter his first signing at Sussex Records. Avant jokes in the film that Rodriguez’s debut, “Cold Fact,” sold six copies — and it’s possible he’s not that far off, as the album never charted, even locally.

 

Still, Avant stuck with him and sent Rodriguez to London to record a second album, “Coming From Reality,” with producer Steve Rowland. Released in 1971, it, too, flopped just as Sussex was enjoying its first hit, Withers’ top five single “Ain’t No Sunshine.” Cut from the Sussex roster, Rodriguez walked away from music and worked in construction and demolition, concurrently earning a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and raising three daughters. He never left Detroit.

 

Fast-forward to 2002. Northern Irish DJ/producer David Holmes put Rodriguez’s song “Sugar Man” on a mixtape that caught the attention of Matt Sullivan, then in the early days of his reissue label Light in the Attic in Seattle. But as it was for many — and this is a key part of the “Searching for Sugar Man” story — finding information about Rodriguez was beyond difficult. It took a couple of years for Sullivan to track down a copy of “Cold Fact,” eventually buying an Australian CD on eBay.

 

After falling in love with the music, Sullivan began his own search for “Sugar Man,” a journey that connected him with a record storeowner in South Africa, Rodriguez’s daughter Regan and Avant.

 

“It took about three or four years to convince Avant to sublicense the masters,” says Sullivan, who recently set up a Los Angeles home for the label. “He was frustrated that he couldn’t find anyone in the music business as passionate about [Rodriguez]. ["Cold Fact" producer] Mike Theodore was in touch with Clarence and he ended up convincing Clarence that we were the right fit.”

 

Light in the Attic reissued “Cold Fact” in August 2008 and Coming From Reality in May 2009. Sullivan was key in getting Rodriguez back onstage as well, booking him at Joe’s Pub in New York and the Echo in Los Angeles in 2008, then in London and Chicago, where he opened for Animal Collective the following year. A few dozen dates followed — San Francisco, Vancouver, Seattle, Atlanta — but the reissues didn’t spark the interest the way the documentary has.

 

While Sullivan was negotiating for Rodriguez’s music rights, Malik Bendjelloul, a documentarian for Swedish TV, was traveling through Spanish-speaking countries in the Americas and Africa looking for stories that could be told in six-minute segments. His trip, undertaken in 2006, was going well.

 

“I found six stories I liked — one in Ethiopia, one more in South Africa, one in Mexico,” Bendjelloul says. “I was already happy, and then I found [Rodriguez's] story and it was 10 times better. It was the best story I had ever heard. It was a Cinderella story, but even better. It had a great soundtrack.”

 

Bendjelloul, a rail-thin young man whose passion for Rodriguez comes through in a constant state of exuberance, is telling this tale on the patio of a West Hollywood, Calif., hotel restaurant where Rodriguez, seated beside him in his customary dark pastel suit, is listening to it all for the umpteenth time. Uncharacteristically, he interrupts.

 

“Cinderella? As opposed to Sleeping Beauty? I knew where I was — and I like my family,” Rodriguez says, before letting out a hearty laugh.

 

They have become a curious duo on this journey — Bendjelloul, a music fan who can’t believe Rodriguez’s work was overlooked, and Rodriguez, who calls himself a “musical/political” artist and is just as likely to discuss Syria or political oppression as the music business or journalism.

 

At Q&As, Bendjelloul gladly defers to the subject of his film, letting him tell parts of the story that aren’t onscreen. Truth be told, Bendjelloul knows more about the story than Rodriguez: He shot three-quarters of the movie before he ever met his subject; only because he had so much footage did Rodriguez agree to appear on camera.

 

“After he showed it to me I felt he had enough in there without me,” Rodriguez says. “I’m only in the film eight minutes . . . He picked out everything and I try to have a little say in it. He was kind to me.”

 

“There will be an interest in the soundtrack as a stand-alone expression,” Sony Legacy’s Block says. “It’s part of the mystical quality of the story. Forty years later, the music holds up and in some ways it’s more relevant today than it was acknowledged at the time. We all believe he is an artist who has created a magnificent body of work, and I’m glad he’s still here to enjoy the acknowledgement.”

Quiso Cristobal Colon darse la vuelta al mundo?

Los hermanos Pinzón eran los tres miembros de la familia Pinzón de Palos de la Frontera, Huelva, a finales del siglo XV y comienzos del siglo XVI. Junto al conocidísimo  ”descubridor”  Cristóbal  Colón participaron activamente en el primer viaje  que tuvo como resultado el descubrimiento de América.

Imagen Cristóbal Colón

Martín Alonso y Vicente Yánez, capitanes de las carabelas La Pinta  y La Niña, respectivamente, son los hermanos más conocidos. Hay un tercer hermano, menos conocido, que iba a bordo de La Pinta como maestre llamado Francisco Martín. Los marineros de Huelva se reconocen como codescubridores del Nuevo Mundo, junto al  Almirante.

Palos de la Frontera, Huelva (en la región de Andalucía)  de vocación marinera, se considera como cuna del descubrimiento de América. Desde su puerto partieron, en agosto de 1492, las tres carabelas que llegaron dos meses más tarde, a las desconocidas tierras americanas que fueron llamadas  ”El Nuevo mundo”. ES

 

http://www.abcdesevilla.es/20121011/andalucia/sevi-cristobal-colon-cadiz-201209271515.html

Por M Moguer

abc de Sevilla

Más allá de la figura del Almirante, diversas teorías señalan a los marineros de Huelva como los codescubridores del Nuevo Continente

Imagen Cristobal Colon

La sombra de Cristóbal Colón es alargada. Tanto, que tapa a quienes con él fueron a América por primera vez. El catedrático de Historia Moderna de la Universidad de Huelva David González Cruz cree que los marineros que le acompañaron son, más que una ayuda, los codescubridores del Nuevo Mundo. Los hermanos Pinzón, de hecho, «son fundamentales en el viaje de Colón. Arriesgan sus vidas, su dinero y consiguen a los mejores marineros disponibles», explica González Cruz.

Imagen de Vicente Yánez Pinzón

No acaba ahí la importancia de los Pinzón. Cuenta González que una de las ideas que se manejan sobre el viaje descubridor de las tres carabelas a América es que la travesía pudo acabar mucho antes de lo esperado. «Hay quien sostiene que cuando Colón empieza a ver que no están por donde él había calculado, decide que se vuelve a España». La orden recibe una respuesta rotunda de Martín Alonso Pinzón: «Antes muerto que volver». Es, se supone, gracias a esta negativa por la que Colón llega a descubrir el Nuevo Mundo. Muy distinta hubiese sido la cosa de seguir la idea de volverse. «Hay quien cree que eso no fue así, pero es una de las versiones», aclara González.

Imagen de Martin Alonso Pinzon

Las tierras de la cuñada de Colón

Para conmemorar el descubrimiento de América, está previsto celebrar un congreso sobre la figura de Colón, los marineros que le acompañaron y los hechos de 1492. Dentro de estos actos cobra especial relevancia la ponencia del catedrático González Cruz. Este investigador de la Universidad de Huelva ha encontrado un documento que probaría la presencia de la cuñada de Colón en la provincia onubense en algún momento entre 1484 y 1492.

Imagen de la Pinta, la Niña y La  Santa Maria

Según una carta del entonces duque de Medinaceli, explica González  el anterior duque habría arrendado unas tierras de considerable extensión a Briolanja Muñiz, noble portuguesa llegada a la zona de San Juan del Puerto para su repoblación. Muñiz, cuñada de Cristóbal Colón, sería la razón por la que el descubridor acudió a España tras la negativa de la Corona de Portugal a financiar su viaje. «Con pocos medios económicos, tenía que pedir ayuda a alguien para embarcarse a lo que él creía que serían las Indias. Y cuando los reyes de Portugal le dicen que no participan, recuerda a su cuñada, en buena posición económica y bien relacionada en España».

Este dato, que hasta ahora no se conocía, probaría que la cuñada de Colón estuvo cultivando tierras de San Juan del Puerto. Y que fue esa la razón de la llegada de Colón a España. González, autor del libro «Descubridores de América, Colón, los marinos y los puertos», entiende que este extremo de la llegada del descubridor a Huelva es una novedad.

También destaca este investigador del «maltrato» histórico a la provincia de Huelva. «A la provincia no le reportó beneficios en 1492 el descubrimiento de América porque todo se trasladó a Sevilla. Tampoco fue compensada. Ni entonces ni ahora, puesto que aún no ha sido nombrada Patrimonio de la Humanidad».

 

 

Puerto Rico Votes on Status: A Primer on Independence

Hola amigos:  ”PR Votes on Status: A Primer on Independence”, explains in detail one of the  3 options (Independence, Sovereign Commonwealth and Statehood) of the next Plebiscite on status, the option of independence. Even if it’s not your option, the article is well written and you will understand much better the possible actions and reactions and will help with your critical thinking approach to developing and understanding the topic.  The author words are: “while independence will probably not garner enough votes to win (based on how independence has 4 – 5% of the vote in previous referendums), it remains to be seen how it could ultimately make people in Congress wary of accepting a tropical Quebec if statehood wins”. ES

Puerto Rican Flag Image

 

by Jean Vidal

http://politic365.com/2012/10/08/puerto-rico-votes-on-status-a-primer-on-independence/

 

As Puerto Ricans get close to Election Day, voters will face three non-territorial (read: colonial) options regarding their political relationship with the United States. These options are: Independence, Sovereign Commonwealth and Statehood. The current status, “commonwealth” is a territorial status since it falls under the U.S. Constitution’s territorial clause, as was recently confirmed by the Congressional Research Service. This article will explain, in greater detail, the option of independence.

Puerto Rico has always maintained an independence movement, perhaps much to the envy of Alaska and Todd Palin. During the first half of the 20th century, the independence movement was a forced to be reckoned with, although falling short of being a majority in the Island. During the second half of the 20th century, the independence movement was reduced to single digits by a combination of factors, including but not limited to: (1) The growth of a larger middle class; (2) Intense persecution of Independence supporters by the Federal government under the infamous COINTELPRO program; (3) A likewise intense persecution of supporters by the state government under the “Carpetas” program; and (4) The movement of independence supporters to the Popular Democratic Party as a means to an end to stop statehood. This is by no means an exhaustive list of factors, but they are the main four factors that have shrunk the Independence movement into a single digit constituency. That said, and recognizing that the majority of voters would not select it over statehood or any version of the Commonwealth status, it has always remained a staple in our politics.

If voters were to choose Independence, the newly elected sovereignty would not happen overnight. Puerto Rico would petition, and Congress would consider, a multi-year transition plan in which Puerto Rico would move towards independence from the U.S., including but not limited to: (1) Transferring or apportioning social security, Medicare, Medicaid and veterans benefits contributions/entitlements that have already been paid for; (2) Determining the rights or manner of naturalization for Boricuas born in an Independent Puerto Rico when both parents are U.S. Citizens; (3) Military relations and alliances and (4) Determining the role of the existing U.S. District Court under an independent Puerto Rico, since federal jurisdiction would cease to exist.

As far as citizenship goes, Puerto Ricans who currently have U.S. Citizenship cannot be stripped of said citizenship merely because of Puerto Rico’s newly found status. However, people born under the new republic would not be entitled to automatic citizenship. The US may, at its prerogative, provide a quicker path towards citizenship for Puerto Ricans born in the Island to U.S. Citizens, but that by no means is a guarantee. The potential loss of citizenship has always been a hard pill to swallow for Puerto Ricans, but those who support independence recognize that it is a benefit that cannot exist in an independent Puerto Rico.

On the budget, Puerto Rico currently spends close to 4 dollars in federal funds for every 1 dollar it generates stateside. While significant portions of those funds are entitlements, a greater portion is not. An independent Puerto Rico would need to find a manner to make up the shortfall within the transition time, which is ultimately agreed to by Congress.  By the same token, Puerto Rico has nearly half of its population living under or near poverty levels, receiving some type of government assistance (mostly federally funded). Thus, it is quite possible Puerto Rico would experience a significant population transfer of U.S. Citizens to the mainland, given worries and anxieties of their benefits in the Island versus those on the mainland.

However, proponents of independence claim that said option is the only one that guarantees freedom from judicial and legal decisions from other nations (the U.S.) that bind Puerto Rico in ways contrary to Puerto Rico’s self-interest. They argue that Puerto Rico would benefit from greater economic freedom by being able to trade with other nations, free itself from the shackles of the Jones Act, and do away with over burdening federal regulation.

Finally, while independence will probably not garner enough votes to win (based on how independence has 4 – 5% of the vote in previous referendums), it remains to be seen how it could ultimately make people in Congress wary of accepting a tropical Quebec if statehood wins. On November 6th, if Puerto Ricans finally vote against the colonial situation, we may begin to find out.

 

History of Puerto Rico – First Part, Ch. 19 – RA Van Middeldyk

RA Van MiddeldykHola amigos: Today I bring you ‘The History of Puerto Rico” From the Spanish Discovery to the American Occupation / Middeldyk, R.A. Van, Chapter 19.

The attack of San Juan by the Hollanders under Bowdoin was on the morning of the 24th of September, 1625.The guard on San Felipe del Morro announced 8 ships to windward of the port…ES

History of Puerto Rico by Van Middeldyk  Book Image

 

CHAPTER XIX

ATTACK ON SAN JUAN BY THE HOLLANDERS UNDER BOWDOIN

1625

Holland emancipated itself from Spanish domination in 1582 and assumed
the title of “the United Provinces of Netherland.” After nearly half a
century of an unequal struggle with the most powerful kingdom in
Europe, the people’s faith in final success was unbounded, while Spain
was growing weary of the apparently interminable war. At this
juncture, proposals for a suspension of hostilities were willingly
entertained by both nations, and after protracted negotiations, a
truce of twelve years was signed in Bergen-op-Zoom, April 9, 1609. In
it the absolute independence of the United Provinces was recognized.

This gave the Spanish colonies a welcome respite from the ravages of
privateers till 1621, the first year of the reign of King Philip IV,
when hostilities immediately recommenced. France and England both came
to the assistance of the Provinces with money for the raising of
troops, and the wealthy merchants of Holland, following the example of
the French merchants in the former century, fitted out fleets of
privateers to prey upon the commerce and colonies of Spain and
Portugal. The first exploits of these privateers were the invasion of
Brazil and the sacking of San Salvador, of Lima and Callao (1624).

Puerto Rico was just beginning to recover from the prostration in
which the last invasion had left it, when on the morning of the 24th
of September, 1625, the guard on San Felipe del Morro announced 8
ships to windward of the port.

Juan de Haro, the governor, who had assumed the command only a few
months before, mounted to an outlook to observe them, and was informed
that more ships could be seen some distance down the coast. He sent
out horsemen, and they returned about 8 o’clock at night with the news
that they had counted 17 ships in all.

Alarm-bells were now rung and some cannon fired from the forts to call
the inhabitants together. They were directed to the plaza, where arms
and ammunition were distributed. During the night the whole city was
astir preparing for events, under the direction of the governor.

Next morning the whole fleet was a short distance to windward. Lest a
landing should be attempted at the Boqueron or at Goat’s Creek, the
two most likely places, the governor ordered a cannon to be planted at
each and trenches to be dug. In the meantime, the people, who had
promptly answered the call to arms, and the garrison were formed into
companies on the plaza and received orders to occupy the forts,
marching first along the shore, where the enemy could see them, so as
to make a great show of numbers.

The artillery in the fort was in bad condition. The gun-carriages were
old and rotten. Some of the pieces had been loaded four years before
and were dismounted at the first firing. One of them burst on the
sixth or seventh day, killing the gunners and severely wounding the
governor, who personally superintended the defense.

In the afternoon of the day of their arrival the Hollanders came down
under full sail “with as much confidence,” says the chronicler, “as if
they were entering a port in their own country.”

That night the fort was provisioned as well as the scanty resources of
the island permitted. The defenders numbered 330, and the food supply
collected would not enable them to stand a long siege. The supply
consisted of 120 loads of casabe bread, 46 bushels of maize, 130 jars
or jugs of olive oil, 10 barrels of biscuit, 300 island cheeses, 1
cask of flour, 30 pitchers of wine, 200 fowls, and 150 small boxes of
preserved fruit (membrillo).

Fortunately during the night 50 head of cattle and 20 horses were
driven in from the surrounding country.

From the 26th to the 29th the enemy busied himself landing troops,
digging trenches, and planting 6 pieces of cannon on a height called
“the Calvary.” Then he began firing at the fort, which replied, doing
considerable damage.

At 9 o’clock on the morning of the 30th, a drummer under a flag of
truce presented himself before the castle with a letter addressed to
the governor. It was couched in the following terms:

“Senor Governor Don Juan Faro, you must be well aware of the reasons
of our coming so near and of our intentions. Therefore, I, Bowdoin
Hendrick, general of these forces, in the name of the States General
and of his Highness the Prince of Orange, do hereby demand that you
deliver this castle and garrison into our hands, which doing we will
not fail to come to terms with you. And if not, I give you notice,
that from this day forward we will spare neither old nor young, woman
nor child; and to this we wait your answer in a few words.

“BOWDOIN HENDRICK.”

To which epistle the governor replied:

“I have seen your paper, and am surprised that you should ask such a
thing of me, seeing that I have served thirteen years in Flanders,
where I have learned to value your boastings and know what sieges are.
On the contrary, if you will deliver the ships in which you have come
to me, I will let you have one to return with. And these are the
orders of my King and Master, and none other, with which I have
answered your paper, in the Castle of San Felipe del Morro, the 30th
of September, 1625.

“JUAN DE HARO.”

The next day a heavy cannonading commenced, the Hollanders firing over
150 shots at the castle with small effect. The same day a Spanish ship
arrived with wine and provisions, but seeing the danger it ran of
being taken, did not enter the port, but steered to la Espanola, to
the great disappointment of the people in the fort.

On the 4th of October the governor ordered a sortie of 80 men in three
parties. On the 5th Captain Juan de Amezquita led another sortie, and
so between sorties, surprises, night attacks, and mutual cannonadings
things continued till the 21st of October.

On that day Bowdoin sent another letter announcing his intention of
burning the city if no understanding was arrived at. To which letter
the governor replied that there was building material enough in the
island to construct another city, and that he wished the whole army of
Holland might be here to witness Spanish bravery.

Bowdoin carried his threat into effect, and the next day over a
hundred houses were burned. Bishop Balbueno’s palace and library and
the city archives were also destroyed. To put a stop to this wanton
destruction Captains Amezquita and Botello led a sortie of 200 men.
They attacked the enemy in front and rear with such _elan_ that they
drove them from their trenches and into the water in their haste to
reach their launches.

This, and other remarkable exploits, related by the native
chroniclers, so discouraged the Hollanders that they abandoned the
siege on the 2d of November, leaving behind them one of their largest
ships, stranded, and over 400 dead.

The fleet repaired to la Aguada to refit. Bowdoin, who, apparently,
was a better letter writer than general, sent a third missive to the
governor, asking permission to purchase victuals, which was, of
course, flatly refused.

The king duly recompensed the brave defenders. The governor was made
Chevalier of the Order of Santiago and received a money grant of 2,000
ducats. Captain Amezquita received 1,000 ducats, and was later
appointed Governor of Cuba. Captain Botello also received 1,000
ducats, and others who had distinguished themselves received
corresponding rewards.

Puerto Rico’s successful resistance to this invasion encouraged the
belief that, provided the mother country should furnish the necessary
means of defense, the island would end by commanding the respect of
its enemies and be left unmolested. But the mother country’s wars with
England, France, and Holland absorbed all its attention in Europe and
consumed all its resources. The colonies remained dependent for their
defense on their own efforts, while privateers, freebooters, and
pirates of the three nations at war with Spain settled like swarms of
hornets in every available island in the West Indies.